🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". The policy could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors unless parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," said a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust research".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the state government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain individuals to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from the West, additional nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this international debate evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that states globally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.